The Non-Obvious Insights Blog. Non-Obvious Insights
The Non-Obvious Insights Blog.

Dedicated To Helping Readers
Be More Interesting
Since 2004.

As Featured In:

Why Brand Names Matter In The Travel Industry

If I named my next kid Jeeves, would I be limiting him to a future career as a butler?  What else could someone named Jeeves do?  Most marketers understand that names matter for perception, but what impact can they have on actual performance?  The past several weeks I have had to rent a car from a number of different providers.  Unlike airlines or hotels, where the points I rack up tend to provide a significant incentive to stick with one particular brand … when it comes to car rental I am completely disloyal.  For work, I use Hertz because booking with my corporate card, the insurance is automatically included and I get the fast gold service.  That is a really significant benefit, because it gets me to rent a car from a brand that I have disliked for a very long time.  Someday I’ll likely share my disaster stories with Hertz – but this post is about something else. 

Imb_carrentalratings_2 For personal use, my first choice is Avis because I have always gotten good service from them.  If the price is relatively equal, I will always pick Avis – as I did this past weekend in Denver.  Otherwise, I will go for the cheapest possible car in the right style.  Two weeks ago in Detroit, this was how I ended up with an awful experience using Thrifty.  All of these rentals got me thinking about the brands I would choose and recommend to others and those I wouldn’t.  J.D. Power ranks all the major car rental agencies (with the exception of Payless which is apparently so bad it didn’t make their 2006 survey at all).  Enterprise is the consistent winner for overall customer satisfaction, as the chart at left shows (click chart to enlarge) – but more interesting is the ranking of the brands.

Did you notice that all of the bottom ranked brands have names associated with how cheap they are: Budget, Thrifty, Dollar, and Payless (not even ranked).  When your brand name tells your customers that you aim to compete on price, they are unlikely to expect anything more than the cheapest rate.  Imagine if other industries did this.  Hotels don’t … they are named after real people like J.W. Marriott, Conrad Hilton or Berthold Kempinski.  Airlines choose nationalistic, geographic or patriotic names – like United, American, Air China or Singapore Air.  Even in the low fare category – hotels have brands like Red Roof Inn or Comfort Inn and airlines pick names like Southwest and JetBlue.  Each often competes on price, but none brands itself that way.  When it comes to travel, cost is obviously a concern … but leading with it as your core selling point and brand doesn’t seem to be working.  When choosing your brand name, it pays not to confuse a key selling point with the essence of your entire brand.

5 thoughts on “Why Brand Names Matter In The Travel Industry”

  1. Great point. I tend to prefer Hertz and Avis since they’re more likely to have on-site lots and faster service than the cheaper options. It may be irrational, but after a long flight, I’m willing to pay quite a bit more to just get out of the airport.

    Of course, I don’t always have this mindset at the time of booking, but I’m working on thinking about my mid-travel mindset when booking.

    Reply
  2. This is a nice analysis. But the interesting point IMO is not only for travel related business, but as an overall brand vs. consumer behavior. the “low price” is simply an ambivalent value.

    Reply
  3. Surely its a nice analysis, but you cant expect good service from low cost operators, thats where they differentiate with others and will always have low customer satisfaction index. We all need to understand the basic operating cost will not differ much cars will still cost the same its just the service which will make the difference and get the cost down. Same is with the airlines planes cost the same for all or possibily it will cost more to low cost operators as they individually would be buying less in numbers also they contingency during delays will not be strong to provide options to the customer. I strongly beleive when going for a low cost operator we should not expect great services coming our way, thats rule of thumb for these players.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

The Non-Obvious Insights Newsletter. Non-Obvious Insights
Layer 97
The Non-Obvious Insights Newsletter
Layer 118

Skip the obvious and anticipate the future with our weekly newsletter. Join over 25,000 subscribers and start receiving the stories (and insights) you’ve been missing.

Newsletter Subscribe

All Books

#1 WSJ & USA Today Bestselling Author

Rohit is the author of 10 books on trends, the future of business, building a more human brand with storytelling and how to create a more diverse and inclusive world.

Contact

Have a Question or Inquiry?

Just fill out this form, and we’ll get back to you within 24 hours!

Contact

About You

What Are You Contacting Us About*:

Your Message