We have been living in an interruption culture. Many authors, including Seth Godin, have rightly pointed out the pitfalls of interruption marketing in this environment. Grabbing the consumers attention with interruption and hoping for engagement is a dying model. Consumer respond to messages that are relevant, and are presented at a relevant time. Timing is the key. But even as interruption marketing is failing, interruption communication is hotter than ever. Instant messaging is interruptive by nature, and usage of IM is increasing. A few days ago CNET just published their report indicating that nearly 66% of 13-21 year-olds say they send more IMs than e-mails. Even more interestingly, the article notes that 58% of people are using it to communicate with colleagues at work. So the question is, if interruption marketing doesn’t work, why is interruption communication thriving?
Some could argue that IM messages are more personal, non-commercial and more relevant. But I don’t believe any of these arguments can fully account for why IM use is rising so dramatically. Rather, I believe that in many ways, we like living in an interruption culture. People sometimes want interruption. Anyone who has procrastinated doing something or struggled to find inspiration knows that sometimes it is the interruption that allows us the clarity to complete a task. In addition, IM gives us a virtual billboard that we can hang in front of ourselves to declare our physical and mental state (Busy/Out to Lunch/Online) All of a sudden, everyone can tell if you are able to talk or not. As a result, IM allows far more civilized interruption communications … but they are still interruptions. So if interruptions are ok as long as users have some amount of control, why shouldn’t they be able to tell advertisers when they are receptive to being interrupted with their messages? What if there was Opt-in IMvertising, where consumers could ask for marketing messages, or refuse them based on setting their current status? Suddenly, instant communications with consumers as they watch television shows or shop/search for products online could be possible. IM has the potential to be far more than a growing customer service/support tool online, and Opt-in IMvertising could lead the way.
Hi Rohit– it’s been a while since I’ve seen your Blog. Boy, wonderful changes, the picture and content are great.
My comments regarding your post are really more about productivity and not too much about internet marketing… about the higher level people I coach for productivity in their home offices, and business offices. They can’t stand interuptions. They can’t stand all the constant reminders that they’ve got new e-mails. One of the biggest things I tell them is that e-mail takes too long and they should be welcoming IM’s with open arms. And forget sending or receiving so many e-mails– FOR GOD’S SAKE, pick up the darn phone and call someone. You’ll get your answers faster, and stop going around and around with endless detail and needing spell check.
But this again means that the more successful people I work with, are usually older, in their 30’s and 40’s and 50’s. They may have a harder time focusing. What’s I’d really give $10 for, is to see the under-30 generation when they are 40 or 50. Will they be able to handle the constant interuptions?